(3rd LD) Coupang's U.S. investors notify Korea of intent to file arbitration claims, request U.S. gov't probe

General / 이해아 / 2026-01-23 15:16:36
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • kakao
  • naver
  • band
(3rd LD) Coupang investors-complaints
▲ A pedestrian walks by a Coupang delivery van in Seoul in this Dec. 29, 2025, file photo. (Yonhap)

(3rd LD) Coupang investors-complaints

(3rd LD) Coupang's U.S. investors notify Korea of intent to file arbitration claims, request U.S. gov't probe

(ATTN: UPDATES with refutation by prime minister's office)

By Woo Jae-yeon and Song Sang-ho

SEOUL/WASHINGTON, Jan. 23 (Yonhap) -- Two U.S. investors in e-commerce giant Coupang Inc. on Thursday notified the South Korean government of their intent to bring arbitration claims against it over what they called "discriminatory" acts toward the U.S.-listed firm, and requested a U.S. government probe into the matter.

Greenoaks Capital Partners and Altimeter Capital Management took the actions, decrying South Korean authorities' investigations into Coupang following revelations in November about a massive customer data leak, according to documents that their legal representative, Covington & Burling LLP, submitted to the two governments.

The Seoul government, along with experts, has been conducting a probe into the incident, in which about 33.7 million customers are believed to have been affected. Coupang has claimed a perpetrator accessed data from only about 3,000 of the accounts in question.

In a notice addressed to President Lee Jae Myung and Chung Hong-sik, the deputy minister for international legal affairs at Seoul's justice ministry, the U.S. investors expressed their intent to file arbitration claims under the South Korea-U.S. free trade agreement. They hold equity interests in Coupang valued at more than US$1.5 billion.

In a separate document sent to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the investors requested that Washington investigate what they said were "unreasonable" and "discriminatory" acts by the Seoul government against Coupang, and impose "appropriate" trade remedies. They cited Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

The two companies claimed that South Korea's policy enforcement and regulatory pressure regarding Coupang appear to "far exceed" the scrutiny imposed on its domestic Korean and Chinese competitors.

"As Coupang took increasing market share from Korean and Chinese competitors, enforcement actions across the Korea Fair Trade Commission, National Tax Service, Ministry of Employment and Labor, Financial Supervisory Service, and others increased, resulting in hundreds of audits, inspections, and raids and more penalties against Coupang than any other company in Korean history," they said in a joint press release.

Characterizing the data breach as a "limited and constrained" incident, they accused the South Korean government of making "false and defamatory" claims, and senior ruling party officials of an "apparent attempt to inflame Korean public opinion and provide cover for efforts to eliminate Coupang and benefit domestic and Chinese competitors."

They also claimed that the Seoul government's "targeted and hostile interference" over the data breach has led to billions of dollars in lost market capitalization.

"These losses have been borne directly by U.S. shareholders -- including individual investors and institutional funds holding the retirement savings of millions of American workers," they said.

In the notice to the Korean government, the investors claimed that as Coupang was threatening the historical dominance of its Korean and Chinese competitors, the Seoul government began "weaponizing the administrative power of the state, and even acting outside its sovereign capacity, to disrupt Coupang's operations."

In the document to the USTR, the investors also pointed out that South Korean Prime Minister Kim Min-seok urged state regulators in December to approach enforcement against Coupang for the data breach "with the same determination used to wipe out mafias."

Kim's office refuted the claim Friday, saying the quote was taken out of context and distorted "intentionally."

The prime minister had stressed the need to "strictly remedy the unfair practices" accumulated over time in the South Korean economy in order to establish an economic order that can be trusted by investors, it said in a press release.

"It was not a remark implying strongly sanctioning or punishing a specific company or companies based in certain countries, and there is no mention whatsoever of a certain company or country, let alone Coupang, in the actual remarks," it said, sharing an excerpt of his remarks.

The company, founded by Korean American entrepreneur Kim Bom-suk, also known as Bom Kim, generates about 90 percent of its sales in South Korea.

On Sunday, Cheong Wa Dae said the ongoing probe into Coupang should not be interpreted as part of a broader trade issue with the United States as the case involves an "unprecedented" scale of personal data leakage, and that the investigations are "in line with applicable laws.

(END)

(C) Yonhap News Agency. All Rights Reserved

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • kakao
  • pinterest
  • naver
  • band