▲ The National Assembly holds a plenary session on Oct. 6, 2023, to vote for the confirmation motion for Supreme Court Chief Justice nominee Lee Gyun-ryong. (Yonhap)
▲ Supreme Court Chief Justice nominee Lee Gyun-ryong answers questions from lawmakers during a confirmation hearing at the National Assembly in Seoul, in this file photo taken Sept. 20, 2023. (Yonhap)

(2nd LD) parliament-Supreme Court chief

(2nd LD) National Assembly rejects Supreme Court chief justice nominee for 1st time in 35 years

(ATTN: UPDATES with presidential office's response)

By Kim Han-joo

SEOUL, Oct. 6 (Yonhap) -- The opposition-controlled National Assembly rejected Supreme Court Chief Justice nominee Lee Gyun-ryong on Friday, marking the first such rejection in 35 years.

Lee's nomination was voted down in a 118-175 vote with two abstentions, shortly after the main opposition Democratic Party (DP), which has a controlling majority in the Assembly, made it a party policy to reject the nomination.

The presidential office immediately expressed regret.

"It is extremely regrettable that an upright and competent judge was rejected to create an unprecedented long-term vacancy in the judiciary," presidential spokesperson Lee Do-woon said during a press briefing. "The people are the victims, and therefore, this can only be described as a political fight that holds the people's rights hostage."

The DP has strongly opposed Lee, a judge at the Seoul High Court, citing several allegations and his alleged personal connections with President Yoon Suk Yeol.

It marks the first such rejection since 1988, when the nomination of Chung Ki-seung was voted down.

This also marks the first time that the Supreme Court is led by an acting chief justice since 1993, when then Chief Justice Kim Deok-ju resigned over a real estate speculation scandal.

It would take at least about a month for Yoon to name a new nominee.

After serving as a judge for about 30 years, Lee was nominated for the top court chief in August to replace Kim Meong-su, whose six-year term ended last month.

The ruling People Power Party has argued that Lee is fit for the job and is the right person to normalize what it claims is the politicization of the judiciary during Kim's tenure, citing Kim's progressive tendencies.

But the DP has also taken issue with Lee's past rulings, where he reportedly reduced the sentences of offenders of sexual crimes or domestic violence multiple times.

Additionally, Lee also faces accusations of purposefully underreporting assets he and his family owned for many years in the annual asset disclosure of high-ranking government officials while he served as a high court judge.

In a message sent to reporters Thursday, Lee asked for the confirmation of his nomination and requested an opportunity, expressing concern that the Supreme Court's en banc hearings and rulings will be virtually impossible in case of a leadership vacuum.

(END)

[ⓒ K-VIBE. 무단전재-재배포 금지]